diff --git a/Benchmarking-CAPTCHA-Throughput-Before-a-Big-Run.md b/Benchmarking-CAPTCHA-Throughput-Before-a-Big-Run.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6c6b8dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Benchmarking-CAPTCHA-Throughput-Before-a-Big-Run.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+CapSkip's API is designed to mirror the request format of the major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, tools and tools that currently target those services can switch to CapSkip with minimal changes and zero new code.
+
+Under the hood, reCAPTCHA v3 hands out a score from observed signals rather than a one checkbox. Producing a usable score calls for tooling designed for that approach, which is exactly what CapSkip is built for.
+
+GeeTest puzzles are notoriously awkward for automation, which is why having a tool that supports them helps a lot. CapSkip handles GeeTest on your machine, so scripts that depend on those sites keep running whenever the puzzle appears.
+
+Residential proxies and residential ones behave in different ways under anti-bot pressure. Regardless of which blend you uses, CapSkip handles the CAPTCHA locally and adds no extra an external dependency to the path.
+
+A Selenium setup remains a staple for browser automation, and CapSkip fits into it cleanly. Your the WebDriver logic as is and hand off the CAPTCHA to CapSkip whenever one appears, so the session keeps going with no human input.
+
+GeeTest puzzles can be famously awkward for automation, which is why running a tool that covers them helps a lot. CapSkip handles GeeTest locally, so scripts that depend on those sites do not break when the challenge shows up.
+
+Image CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, on login forms to registration flows. CapSkip solves thousands of image CAPTCHA types on your own hardware, usually almost instantly. That kind of speed matters the moment you process large volumes.
+
+The developer API is designed to mirror the endpoints of major CAPTCHA-solving services. In practical terms, tools and scripts that currently target those services are able to switch to CapSkip needing minimal changes and no new code.
+
+A migration plan keeps the move smooth: point the endpoint at CapSkip, confirm some live solves, and then cut over the main jobs. Since the API matches popular services, most of the work is already done.
+
+The v3 flavor works differently:  [read more](http://Praxis-Ritthammer.de/index.php?title=Resilient_Retries_For_Guarded_Jobs) rather than a visible challenge, it scores interactions behind the scenes. Getting a usable token takes tooling that handles how v3 behaves, and CapSkip is built to do exactly that, returning results quickly so your pipeline continues.
+
+The v3 flavor works differently: rather than a clickable challenge, it scores behavior behind the scenes. Producing a good score requires a solver that understands the way v3 behaves, and CapSkip is built to do exactly that, returning tokens quickly so your pipeline continues.
+
+Behind the scenes, reCAPTCHA v3 assigns a risk score based on watched signals rather than a single click. Producing a good score takes tooling built for that approach, which is what CapSkip is built for.
+
+Turnstile is now a common barrier on sites that want to block bots without traditional image puzzles. CapSkip clears Turnstile locally in a few seconds, covering both challenge modes. If you run automation that run into Turnstile, that takes away a real obstacle.
+
+Good documentation plus examples shorten adoption smoother. From the setup guide to the API docs and an FAQ, most questions are clear answers before ever filing a ticket, so the team spends time on shipping rather than firefighting.
+
+Fundamentally, a [captcha automation tool](https://plingue.com/read-blog/3889_queue-based-automation-meets-capskip.html) solver reads a challenge and produces the solution a site expects, so an hands-off tool can keep going. The difference with CapSkip is that everything happens locally - no challenge data leaves your hardware, and you avoid per-solve fees. This mix of control and predictable cost turns out to be hard to beat for serious workloads.
+
+Data control is a genuine issue when each challenge gets shipped to a third-party service. Because CapSkip runs locally, no challenge data leaves your machine, so sensitive workflows stay on your own systems. For sensitive work, this is often the deciding factor.
+
+The browser extension brings solving right into Chrome, Firefox and Chromium-based browsers such as Brave and Edge. For manual tasks or quick automation, it handles challenges without any configuration.
+
+Automated browsers leave signals that detection systems look at, which is why combining careful automation setup with reliable CAPTCHA solving matters. CapSkip covers the challenge half so you focus on the rest.
+
+GeeTest challenges can be notoriously awkward for bots, so running a solver that covers them is a real plus. CapSkip handles GeeTest locally, so workflows that rely on these sites do not break when the puzzle shows up.
+
+A major benefits of running locally is cost. Traditional services bill per solve, so your bill climb the moment throughput grows. CapSkip goes with flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so scaling without worrying about the meter.
+
+Data collection remains among the most common use cases people adopt a CAPTCHA solver. One blocked request will halt an entire job, so solving challenges on the fly keeps the pipeline steady. CapSkip fits these pipelines neatly.
\ No newline at end of file